Urban A Review of The Family Crucible The Family Crucible, by Napier and Whitakerreads like a novel while at the same time laying down some of the fundamental concepts of family systems therapy. It is a case study of one family's experience in family therapy. While the therapy shifts from daughter to son and then to parent interaction to daughters and son, it is finally the couple's marriage that must be treated if issues are to be resolved. Even the grandparents are brought into therapy to get at the family of origin issues.
Urban A Review of The Family Crucible The Family Crucible, by Napier and Whitakerreads like a novel while at the same time laying down some of the fundamental concepts of family systems therapy. Even the grandparents are brought into therapy to get at the family of origin issues. The book opens with a quote from James Agee and Walker Evans: The book is well written and hard to put down once you start reading it.
Whitaker has been criticized in the field, because many people believe that he does not really have a theory. It is believed that it is only his charismatic personality that drives his treatment.
I believe that one has only to read his chapter in The Handbook of Family Therapy and see these concepts illustrated in The Family Crucible to realize the depth and breadth of his theory. He became involved in treating schizophrenics after World War II. Whitaker was interested in understanding disturbed relationships in a familial context and in determining whether serious symptoms such as those in psychotics might be reinforced by dysfunctional family patterns and beliefs.
From toWhitaker became involved in treating schizophrenia with a type of aggressive play therapy. Whitaker used some outrageous methods, including learning to talk "crazy," arm wrestling, use of a baby bottle, and rocking, all of which were rooted in his training experience.
At the same time that he developed these techniques, he developed a kind of pyknolepsy, wherein he would fall asleep in the middle of a session. He would dream about his relationship with the patient being treated, and then make his associations to the dream a part of the therapy session Whitaker, In justifying his unique techniques, Whitaker emphasized that "Each technique is a process whereby the therapist is developing himself and using the patient as an intermediary, that is the therapist is interacting in a primary process model" p.
InWhitaker moved to Emory, where he became chair of the Department of Psychiatry. It was here that he developed dual co-therapy with Dr.
The development of symbolic-experiential methodology required students to ". Whitaker defined health as ".
He emphasized that what is most important in a healthy family is ". The healthy family is not a fragmented group nor a congealed group. The healthy family will utilize constructive input and handle negative feedback with power and comfort.
The group is also therapist to the individuals" p. Whitaker also defines the healthy family as ". Mother and father are not children and the children are not parents" p. Whitaker also looked at the degree of volitional access parents and children have to outside support and interests. The families of origin in healthy families are on friendly terms.
Importantly, Whitaker looked to spontaneity as a marker of healthy communication in families.
The healthy family allows each member to admit to problems and to identify competencies. Thus, it is emphasized that healthy families allow great freedom for the individual to be himself.
Whitaker states that ". Whitaker emphasized that a basic characteristic of all healthy families is the availability of an "as if" structure, which permits different family members to take on different roles at different times.
Roles result from interaction instead of being rigidly defined. They are defined by various conditions, including the past, present, future, culture, and demands of the family at a given time.
On the other hand, Whitaker defined the dysfunctional family as ". Whitaker placed heavy emphasis on the technique of co-therapy. In The Family Crucible, for example, the reader constantly witnesses Whitaker and Napier turn up the power.
There is a decisive here-and-now quality to symbolic-experiential interventions used in The Family Crucible, with a focus upon creating and then addressing en vivo emotional dynamics in therapy session.
Napier and Whitaker insisted that the entire Brice family be present in therapy. He asserts that it is ".The Family Crucible, by Napier and Whitaker (), reads like a novel while at the same time laying down some of the fundamental concepts of family systems therapy.
It is a case study of one family's experience in family therapy. Carl Whitaker, a pioneer in family therapy, took an experiential—some would say unorthodox—approach to facilitating growth within family systems.
In The Family Crucible, the story and information presented is anything but sleepy. I never would have chosen this book on my own, but am certainly glad it was assigned for my couples and family counseling course this term.
I was drawn into the Brice family from the first page and had difficulty putting the book down/5. This item: The Family Crucible: The Intense Experience of Family Therapy (Perennial Library) by Augustus Y. Napier Paperback $ In Stock. Ships from and sold by heartoftexashop.com().
The Family Crucible: a Systemic Approach Essay Sample. The Family Crucible, written by Augustus Napier and Carl Whitaker (), exemplifies a fragmented family system. The family consists of David a VIP lawyer, Carolyn an angry mother, Claudia an enraged teenager, Don the year-old peacemaker, and six-year-old Laura.
The Family Crucible: a Systemic Approach words | 6 pages Brice Family: A systemic approach Juli Baines MFCC/ January 9, Jenny Brenn, MFT, LCADC The Brice Family: A systemic approach The Family Crucible, written by Augustus Napier and Carl .